THE WAR ON TERROR

We've all heard about the so-called "war on terror", and it should be no surprise that it appears it will not end, since it is not possible to wage war against a methodology. Indeed the greatest failure thus far has been the world's inability, or politically correct unwillingness, to properly identify the enemy which is the counter-gospel, antichrist, anti-religion of Islam itself. We will remain embroiled in a world war, whether the powers that be wish to admit it or not, because it is the same old dar al-Islam VS the dar al-Harb. That is the "house of submission" VS the "house of war". If you are a follower of Muhammad you are in the house of submission, but if you are a non-Muslim you are in the house of war and while you may not be at war against Islam, Islam has been at war against you for 1400 years. The reason being that Muhammad's followers are commanded to fight and slay, then subjugate surviving non-Muslims to Muhammad's followers, as explored on a prior page.

Ephesians 6:10 Finally, my brethren, be strong in the Lord, and in the power of his might. 11 Put on the whole armour of God, that ye may be able to stand against the wiles of the devil. 12 For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places. 13 Wherefore take unto you the whole armour of God, that ye may be able to withstand in the evil day, and having done all, to stand. 14 Stand therefore, having your loins girt about with truth, and having on the breastplate of righteousness; 15 And your feet shod with the preparation of the gospel of peace; 16 Above all, taking the shield of faith, wherewith ye shall be able to quench all the fiery darts of the wicked. 17 And take the helmet of salvation, and the sword of the Spirit, which is the word of God:

Thus born again Christians should not only understand the nature of the war, but also the weapons and defenses God provided for us to engage the enemy of not just the "people of the book", but of the whole of civilized society. As revealed on the another page, the one quarter of mankind in the anti-religion of Islam is a direct and specific enemy of Jesus Christ, having been indoctrinated to DISbelieve the WHOLE SUBJECT of the Gospel - the crucifixion, death and resurrection of Christ - and thus REJECT His shed blood, and to DENY the Son of God and His Father, as articles of their faith in Muhammad alone. Thus Islam is exposed as an anti-a-specific-religion imperialistic political war machine, that is bent on conquest and subjugation of everyone in the world to Muhammad's followers, just as it was in Muhammad's day after the Hijra when Muhammad effectively abandoned eve n the pretense of religiosity.

Ishaq:204/ Tabari VI:134 "'Men of the Khazraj, do you know what you are pledging yourselves to in swearing allegiance to this man.' 'Yes,' they answered. 'In swearing allegiance to him we are pledging ourselves to wage war against all mankind.'"

As in Muhammad's day Islamic centers and mosques are strategic planning centers, toward Islamic imperialistic conquest and subjugation of all non-Muslims, with more than 80% of U.S. Mosques having been (incorrectly labeled as) "radicalized" - which is actually a way of saying attendees are increasingly becoming true fundamental orthodox followers of Muhammad.

Sadly, the U.S. government has blinded itself through political correctness, to the antichrist nature of this 1400 year enemy of mankind, in part because of having divorced or nation from God in 1947 through the Everson Decision which advanced the spurious notion and big lie of a "separation of church and state". Indeed so well grounded in God was our once-great republic that this subject had only been brought before the Supreme Court on two occasions in the prior 150 years. For pity's sake, our Declaration of Independence recognizes our Creator as the sole source of our inalienable rights, followed by a body of law that was not intended to confer rights upon us, but rather was designed to preclude the government from infringing on what we recognize as our God-given rights.

How differently might things be going in the world today if the enemy of civilized humanity - Islam - had been addressed with the weapons that were assigned to us through the Gospel rather than guns and bombs? Some of our soldiers in Afghanistan unsheathed our sword, by passing out Bibles translated into various Afghan dialects as host gifts, when invited into Afghani homes. However when our military got wind of it, the Bibles were confiscated from our boy s and burned, thus disarming our troops of our God-given weapon while advancing a spiritual vacuum, that leaves little to expect beyond a continuation of what is increasingly becoming a war of attrition and steady stream of spilled blood and treasure. What else could we really expect, when we have assigned ourselves the task of being a spiritually blind secular mediator, between warring factions of antichrists?

Even as we witness the Muslim Brotherhood consolidation of power throughout the Middle East and the resulting persecution and murder of Christians as churches burn, spiritual blindness prevented most from understanding exactly what kind of democracy should have been expected to result from the so-called "Arab Spring", in which the majority and even near unanimity of voters are antichrists. The world seems to have been struck dumb to the fact that freedom, liberty and the right to self-determination afforded by democracies and representative republics, are the very antithesis of Islam. Indeed a casual glance around the world today, or historically, reveals that Islam can only survive in an absence of free speech and under authoritative, iron-fisted, oppressive, despotic, murderous, totalitarian governance. Here's a small window on the fate of a world run by Islam:

AP - December 06, 2006 MOGADISHU, Somalia - "Residents of a southern Somalia town who do not pray five times a day will be beheaded, an Islamic courts official said Wednesday, adding the edict will be implemented in three days."

Since the prescribed penalty for "apostasy" or leaving Islam for any reason range all the way from flogging to the death penalty by State statute, it is very difficult for an individual Muslim in a Muslim dominated society, to contemplate entering into a relationship with Jesus Christ. "In 2011, 20 countries across the globe prohibited its citizens from apostasy; in these countries, it is a criminal offense to abandon one's faith to become atheist, or convert to another religion.[7][8]". In many of those countries the penalty under the law is death, because that is the official penalty prescribed under the Islamic sharia law regarding "renegades and infidels" (law of Al-Qaeda Al-Faquhia).

When not murdered for "apostasy" by the State, Muslims otherwise risk being disinherited and disowned, while loosing family, friends, community and even their livelihood. Offspring may even be murdered by their own mother or father in an Islamic so-called "honor killing". Isn't that stunningly ironic? The ultimate in cowardice and dishonoring oneself - committing an act of cold-blooded murder - is enshrined as a means to preserve one's honor! Even in the west a Muslim is likely to be disowned or disinherited and loose his family and Muslim friends. Indeed many would be left standing alone if it weren't for the love of their newfound Christian community.

The majority of Muslims desire peace, and in spite of the obvious truth desperately try to wish a lie into reality, by deceiving themselves into believing Islam to be a religion of peace. Indeed more than a few have been fooled into believing this demonstrable lie, in spite of a 1400 year history of imperialistic conquest, slaughter and subjugation of non-Muslims, as well as the present day reality of tens of thousands of deadly Islamic terror attacks around the world just since 9-11. Just as the rest of us, most of Muhammad's followers wish for a peaceful world for their children to inherit, which is a reality that all could realize, if everyone were in a relationship with Jesus Christ - the "Prince of Peace". Today six million Muslims come to know the love of God through Jesus Christ every year, in Africa alone, with about a quarter of them doing so through a dream, vision, and/or being spoken to directly by Jesus Christ. Many former Imams are Christian pastors today. A great book on this subject is "Miraculous Movements".

So what if rather than a lone Muslim encountering the Gospel on an individual basis and feeling he had to hide it from others or be killed, instead everyone in his neighborhood received their own copy of the Gospel simultaneously, and knew their neighbors had too?

What if our military employed a three pronged approach to engage this specifically antichrist enemy of Jesus Christ? What if instead of using our drones for purposes of assassination, we equipped them with delivery systems capable of distributing copies of the Gospel of John or Christian tracts, to the streets below? That way thousands of folks in a specific area could receive copies of the Gospel simultaneously.

Leafleting was employed as a military strategy, from the 19th century, pretty much right up until the Islamic beast was healed, and even after. Television and radio are credited in part for disuse of it, but is that a sound reason to abandon the practice, for backwards Islamic countries? What Saudi is going to be able to turn on a radio or TV that is preaching the Gospel, even in front of his own family, when he might risk being ratted out by a family member and perhaps even killed for it? Printed material could be scooped up by individuals and secreted away, and read in their personal time, and passed from hand to friendly hand.

Are national leaders and Imams of Islamic States going to complain: "Oh our people are being destroyed by Western demons that shower down upon our people leaflets that detail the love of God as revealed through the Gospel of Jesus Christ! Oh please stop so we can remain in darkness and from being exposed to the love of God!"

For the second prong, a few weeks after distributing the Gospel, a follow-up of leaflets that simply encourage them to ask their Imams to respond to Islam's embarrassingly unanswerable questions like the ones on the next page, regarding the absence of a historical or archaeological record of Mecca prior to the 4th century AD, and the demographic and geographical impossibility of Abraham, Hagar or Ishmael ever having been within a thousand kilometers of where Mecca was eventually settled. They would all be joined together before their Imam down at the mosque on Friday, with everyone simultaneously knowing what everyone else knew - with that 800 pound gorilla sitting in the room with them - and the Imam unable to provide even a shred of evidence of a pre-4th century AD Mecca, let alone answers to any of the theological opposites other than because "Muhammad said so" or "Muhammad did so". The Imam being left with only the tired old fall-back satanic lie of "corruption" of the Bible - after the lie's having been rendered hollow - constituting more of a tacit admission that Muhammad was a false prophet.

Imagine Islamic governments like Iran expressing outrage at the distribution thereof, yet being stuck having to explain why exposure to words on paper alone, expressing God's love - through leafleting tracts of the Gospel of Jesus Christ that could be prefaced with Muhammad's suras regarding the Bible - could be considered a provocative act! This when Muslims themselves are expected to believe that Jesus is the Messiah, was born of a virgin, was sinless, and ascended physically to heaven. With most of them likely not even currently realizing, that in fact they reject the whole purpose of the Messiah and the whole subject of the Gospel, as do atheists and other such antichrists. Their Imams and government having to explain how leafleting passages from the largest selling book in world history, regarding the Lamb of God, the Prince of Peace of the one true God of love, could be a provocative act. From the Gospel of the very Messiah Yeshua that Muhammad suggested they are supposed to believe in!

What Christian in the U.S. would care if tracts of the false prophet Muhammad's Quran were distributed in our cities? Indeed public discussion regarding the lies and dissimulation that it would contain, would help get our citizens get up to speed on Islam's doctrine of abrogation, and what Islam is actually all about. The truth will always prevail, where freedom of speech is allowed. That is of course the reason the Gospel is restricted in so many Islamic countries. Why Muslims are killed by State statute for leaving Islam, in at least 9 Islamic nation States.

Muhammad's followers are all about establishing a symbolic beachhead in New York across from the site of the World Trade Center, to gloat over their 9-11 conquest in the west, the way they did in Cordoba after the Islamic conquest of Spain. As Newt Gingrich wrote: “every Islamist in the world recognizes Cordoba as a symbol of Muslim conquest.”

Meanwhile the Saudis spend billions of dollars establishing mosques and Islamic centers particularly on U.S. campuses, from which they brainwash weak minded college students into joining them, in Islamic hatred of Jews. If you haven't web searched Islamic propaganda in schools, you need to do so now, in order to understand how Islam has even invaded our public school texts and curricula via the NEA.

The Islamized Godless liberals are all about allowing the Saudis to establish that symbolic beachhead in New York, and monument to their destruction of the twin towers, while cheered on by the eschatologically struck blind liberal supersessionist side of the institutional "church". Building the mosque will be done under the guise of free speech and free exercise of religion, until Christians stand in front of the mosque passing out tracts of the Gospel and face being arrested for exercising free speech, just as the Acts 24 folks experienced in Detroit Michigan.

Even conservative fundamental Christians could champion the 9-11 Mosque - but under one condition. That the public sidewalks in front of that mosque remain a free speech zone, just like the rest of New York city, where citizens could engage in free speech and the free exercise of religion by passing out tracts of the Gospel and engaging in related discussion with Muslims as they enter and leave the mosque. But as we all should already know, and can rest assured with absolute certainty, the area in front of that mosque will be closed to free speech. Most likely by more first amendment-violating law, but failing that in the courts, through the presence of intimidating thugs as police and gutless politicians look the other way as Christians are accosted for exercising our constitutional rights.

How differently might things have gone in the Middle East, if throughout our presence there, we had been mass leafleting tracts of the Gospel of John, or single-sheet tracts like this one on "The Crucifixion of Jesus Christ in Prophecy":

From WND: "The U.S. State Department, in its annual reports on human rights worldwide, consistently has stated 'religious freedom does not exist' in Saudi Arabia, which is dominated by the strict Wahhibist interpretation of Islam. In the kingdom, the State Department says, non-Muslim 'worshippers risk arrest, imprisonment, lashing, deportation and sometimes torture for engaging in religious activity that attracts official attention.'”

Even worse, our boys had taken it upon themselves to import Bibles, to pass out as host gifts, when invited into Afghani homes. However when our politically correct military found out about it, they confiscated all of the Bibles and burned them. Sadly, our nation divorced itself from God (in 1947) and has been sailing rudderless ever since! No surprise when a once-great nation abandons God and surrenders to socialism/Marxism.

The governments of the 53 countries that limit their citizens access to the largest selling book in the history of the world, are guilty of crimes against humanity, or at the very least violating human rights. Rather than a drone, how many tracts or copies of the Gospel of John could be dropped from a C130 Hercules transport plane, over a city like Riyadh Saudi Arabia? How about blanketing Saudi or Pakistani soccer stadiums with a drone? Isn't leafleting the enemy - which is Islam itself in this case - the kind of strategy that our military employed during other wars, in efforts to avoid the necessity of combat and killing?

In all likelihood the three pronged approach detailed previously, along with public discussion, could help cause the collapse of Islam in short order since we would simply be pointing the way to Jesus through the Gospel in the power of the Holy Spirit. No amount of military intervention will ever make it possible to establish and referee a peace with, or between, antichrists. This is made painfully obvious through the mutual murder of Sunni and Shiite Muslims.

Yet the same secular, godless, spirutually blind and rudderless U.S. government, instead, heavily finances several oppressive Islamic slave-states, in which the penalty for "apostasy" is death by statute and the same even for the "crime" of "blasphemy".

The window is rapidly closing. If those like Hillary Clinton get their way, before long the U.N. will be instituting one-sided global anti-blasphemy laws, wherein it will be an international crime to speak the truth about Muhammad as he is revealed through Islam's own books, while remaining perfectly legal for Muslims to continue to blaspheme the Son of God. Would it be surprising to find a president, that suffered Islamic indoctrination as a child, to also be friendly to such laws?

The Everson decision was followed in 1948 by the McCollum decision, which ended prayer in school, as the prophesied apostasy simultaneously gathered steam. That's straying pretty far off the reservation for a country in which the early schools educational materials included Bibles and hymnals.

All the establishment clause was intended to do was prohibit the Federal Government from establishing a State Church, like the Church of England, from which many of our forefathers were fleeing. Individual states were at complete liberty to establish state churches, and several did, until they themselves recognized the error in having done so. Indeed how could a self-governed people who recognize God as the very source of all of our rights, suggest our governance could ever succeed after being separated from God, as so eloquently expressed by so many of our forefathers?

From our Declaration of Independence: "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness."

"And can the liberties of a nation be thought secure if we have lost the only firm basis, a conviction in the minds of the people that these liberties are the gift of God? That they are not to be violated but with His wrath?" - Thomas Jefferson

On the subject of apostasy and the spiritual fall of the U.S., readers that liked "The Harbinger" by Jonathan Cahn that speculates on God's punishment of the U.S. as warned in that Jefferson quote, might enjoy going on the interactive adventure presented on our companion site at "Beyond the Harbinger", that explores even more mathematical precision of prophecy.